![]() ![]() But it remains to be seen how quickly Cupertino’s silicon team can level up the chips' capabilities even further. ![]() Based on the company’s transition timeline, the answer seems to be two years or less. There’s also a question of at what point certain apps, in particular those that aren’t actively maintained, simply stop working on ARM-based Macs. Apple called out that major players like Microsoft and Adobe are already hard at work on the transition, but it seems plausible that certain utilities may get left behind altogether. “I think there will be a culling process like we saw from 32 to 64 bit applications,” says Moorhead. There’s also the question of your existing Mac, and at what point the transition will force you to upgrade. Apple has promised to continue supporting and releasing macOS for Intel-based Macs “for years to come,” with no hard date yet. It’s worth noting, too, that Microsoft and Google have both tried similar convergences across Windows and Chrome, with limited success. Those potential hiccups seem well worth it for the benefits that Apple will reap. ![]() ![]() In fact, you don’t even need to look beyond Apple itself for proof that making your own components can provide major advantages.Īpple has used chip designs from ARM as the basis for its iPhone processors since 2010, when it shipped the A4 processor in the iPad and iPhone 4. Since then, the company has been able to develop its mobile hardware and software in concert, finding efficiencies and targeting specific performance gains in a way that competitors have since tried to emulate in increasing numbers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |